[ad_1]

Editor’s Word: This text is a reprint. It was initially revealed February 7, 2017.

You are most likely conscious that the meals {industry} has the facility to affect your consuming habits by way of the usage of promoting and lobbying for industry-friendly rules. However do you know the U.S. authorities really funds a few of these actions by way of the gathering and distribution of taxes on sure meals?

And that by doing so, the federal government is actively supporting agricultural techniques which might be adversarial to public and environmental well being, and discouraging the adoption of more healthy and extra ecologically sound farming techniques?

The meat {industry} particularly seems to be rife with corruption geared toward defending huge factory-style enterprise fairly than the up-and-coming grass fed {industry}. As defined in Washington Month-to-month:¹

“Think about if the federal authorities mandated {that a} portion of all federal fuel taxes go on to the oil {industry}’s commerce affiliation, the American Petroleum Institute [API].

Think about additional that API used this public cash to finance advert campaigns encouraging individuals to drive extra and switch up their thermostats, all whereas lobbying to discredit oil {industry} critics … That is a deal not even Exxon might pull off, but the nation’s largest meat-packers now take pleasure in one thing fairly prefer it.

[W]hen you purchase a Massive Mac or a T-bone, a portion of the associated fee is a tax on beef, the proceeds from which the federal government arms over to a personal commerce group known as the Nationwide Cattlemen’s Beef Affiliation [NCBA].

The NCBA in flip makes use of this public cash to purchase adverts encouraging you to eat extra beef, whereas additionally lobbying to derail animal rights and different agricultural reform activists, defeat meat labeling necessities and defend the continuing consolidation of the {industry}.”

Federal Tax Helps Beef Business Promote Beef

In a nutshell, the U.S. Division of Agriculture (USDA) beef checkoff program² is a compulsory program that requires cattle producers to pay a $1 price per head of cattle bought.

It is principally a federal tax on cattle, however the cash would not go to the federal government however to state beef councils, the nationwide Cattlemen’s Beef Board (CBB) and the NCBA. All of those organizations are clearly biased towards the concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) mannequin.

The cash is collected by state beef councils, which maintain half and ship the opposite half of the funds to the nationwide CBB, headquartered in Colorado, which is answerable for the nationwide beef promotion marketing campaign. Nationwide, the meat checkoff charges add as much as about $80 million yearly.

As the first contractor for the checkoff program, the NCBA receives a majority of the checkoff proceeds, which is used for analysis and promotion of beef.

However whereas the meat checkoff program started with the perfect of intentions, aiming to assist struggling ranchers by pooling their cash to pay for the promotion of beef, discontent over how the cash is getting used has grown over time.

Checkoff Program No Longer Advantages Small Ranchers — It Harms Them

Many cattle ranchers really feel they’re being pressured to pay for actions that go towards their environmental or moral views on animal welfare and environmental stewardship, for instance. Furthermore, whereas being a federal tax, the federal government has nearly no oversight over how this checkoff cash is used. As reported by Harvest Public Media:³

“Checkoff officers say … each greenback collected by the checkoff delivers $11.20 in return. Amongst its successes is a collection of iconic commercials known as ‘Beef, it is what’s for dinner.’ However there’s much more to the meat checkoff than meets the attention. That $1 evaluation, critics … say, flows with restricted oversight to state and nationwide pursuits.

Sellers should pay even when they do not consider they’ve any say over who will get the cash, or why. They usually should pay even when they consider the fund advances the pursuits of multi-millionaire ranchers towards their very own …

As many as a fourth of the nation’s 730,000 ranchers … have complained for years that the checkoff has grow to be a billion-dollar bonanza for giant ranchers, {industry} executives and large beef packers. Federal statistics present bigger extra environment friendly cattle operations are forcing out smaller ranchers and feedlots.”

One living proof: When a commerce grievance was filed towards Mexico in 2014, NCBA opposed anti-trust enforcement towards the three multinational firms that management greater than 80% of the meat packing {industry}.

The NCBA additionally helps the North American Free Commerce Settlement (NAFTA), which permits for low-cost beef imports, thereby undercutting American ranchers.⁴

What’s Good for Massive Meatpackers Typically Hurts Small Ranchers

Additionally, because the $1 per head price is remitted by federal regulation, checkoff funds should not allowed for use for lobbying or political contributions. Nevertheless, critics have argued that each state beef councils and the nationwide beef board have robust ties to beef {industry} lobbying teams — a few of them even share workplace area.⁵

On the nationwide stage, a majority of the checkoff cash will get funneled into the NCBA, which has a robust political voice within the Washington D.C., the place it has spent tens of millions in marketing campaign contributions and lobbying efforts. In response to Harvest Public Media:⁶

“Within the 2014 mid-term elections alone, the NCBA gave almost $800,000 to primarily Republican political candidates … That quantities to greater than 98% of whole checkoff income and 82% of NCBA’s whole funds, in accordance with a current lawsuit filed by small producers …

That very same lawsuit claims that the NCBA controls half the seats on the meat checkoff’s contracting committee. ‘I feel it’s a damaged system,’ mentioned Wil Bledsoe, president of the Colorado Impartial Cattle Growers Affiliation …

‘I do not need them utilizing my cash to combat my livelihood like they’ve been,’ he mentioned. ‘What’s good for packers is not normally good for the little man, and vice versa. So how can they declare to characterize each?’

… And authorities displays overseeing this system are conscious of the issues, mentioned one former U.S. Division of Agriculture official.

‘The administration is properly conscious that the NCBA has misappropriated producer cash and the NCBA has helped defeat coverage reforms that may have helped small producers,’ mentioned Dudley Butler, who resigned as a high USDA official in 2012. Butler, a lawyer, says the checkoff is nothing greater than an ‘unlawful cattle tax.'”

The Livestock Advertising Affiliation (LMA) has been calling for the USDA to carry a referendum on the potential termination of the meat checkoff, and greater than 146,000 cattle ranchers have signed the petition.⁷

In 2001, the nationwide checkoff program for pork was terminated by a nationwide referendum that passed off in late 2000,⁸ however, because the Des Moines Register bluntly put it:⁹

“The USDA ignored the vote. As an alternative, it created the Nationwide Pork Producers Council and diverted the cash into that — the place it’s used to foyer for company hog pursuits. What meaning is that the checkoff now funds lobbying to help hog confinements which might be damaging our water provides and the environment at the price of household hog farmers who proceed to be squeezed out of the enterprise.”

So, nonetheless to today the combat to terminate this system continues.

Beef Council Accountant Investigated for Embezzlement

Misuse of checkoff funds just isn’t the one downside ranchers are railing towards. Within the beef {industry}, federal authorities started investigating embezzlement fees towards Melissa Morton, a former Oklahoma Beef Council accounting and compliance supervisor,¹⁰ in accordance with the council’s personal inside investigation $2.6 million allegedly got here up lacking below Morton’s watch. As reported by the Cornucopia Institute:

“In 2014, in accordance with the council’s newest federal tax information, the group took in $3.6 million in income. That very same 12 months the compliance supervisor allegedly embezzled $316,231, almost 9% of the state beef council’s annual income.”

In 2016, Morton allegedly solid 131 checks totaling almost $557,790. In response to Mike Callicrate, a cattleman and founding member of the Group for Aggressive Markets (OCM), information of the embezzlement added to “the suspicion that … our bucks should not being utilized in a approach that truly advantages the cowboy that is paying the meat checkoff.”

Embezzlement apart, critics have additionally identified the exorbitant salaries collected by NCBA administration — salaries paid for by checkoff {dollars} collected from ranchers. In a 2015 article, California cattleman Lee Pitts wrote:¹¹

“… [T]he final information I used to be aware of concerning the wage of NCBA’s CEO, Forrest Roberts, was from his 2013 federal tax types when he was paid $428,319. That is extravagant sufficient however in accordance with a Cattleman’s Beef Board huge wig who known as me, Mr. Roberts is now allegedly making $550,000 per 12 months!

… I would not have an issue if Mr. Roberts was being paid with NCBA dues cash, that is their cash and allow them to spend it how they need. However in accordance with my supply, 72% of Robert’s wage is paid by the meat checkoff as a result of that is how a lot time the NCBA says he spends on checkoff issues. 72%!

The NCBA positive could not pay that sort of a wage in the event that they needed to stay off dues, now might they? … In response to one supply, there are at the very least 10 individuals working for the checkoff who’re making greater than $290,000 per 12 months! NCBA paid out $13 million in yearly salaries and 82% of NCBA’s funds comes out of your checkoff {dollars}.”

Checkoff Funds Used to Promote Worldwide Beef

Final 12 months, the Ranchers-Cattlemen Motion Authorized Fund, United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF USA) filed a lawsuit towards the USDA, claiming the meat checkoff tax is “being unconstitutionally used to advertise worldwide beef, to the detriment of U.S. beef merchandise and producers.”¹² In response to R-CALF USA CEO Invoice Bullard:

“The Checkoff’s implied message that every one beef is equal, no matter the place the cattle are born or how they’re raised, harms U.S. farmers and ranchers and deceives U.S. residents.

Regardless of what we all know to be clear proof concerning the top quality of beef raised by unbiased U.S. cattlemen, we’re being taxed to advertise a message that beef raised with out the strict requirements utilized by our members is similar as all different beef, a message we don’t help and don’t agree with.”

R-CALF USA’s co-counsel J. Dudley Butler of the Butler Farm & Ranch Regulation Group PLLC, added: “This isn’t solely a battle to guard constitutional rights however a battle to make sure that our meals provide just isn’t corralled and constrained by multi-national firms leaving unbiased farmers and ranchers as mere serfs on their very own land.”

The lawsuit was filed in response to Montana Beef Council’s advert marketing campaign for Wendy’s — a quick meals chain whose hamburgers can include meat originating in 41 totally different nations. The NCBA additionally has a historical past of selling beef, no matter origin, which is a big detriment to the ranchers paying the checkoff charges that pay for all this promoting and advertising.

The NCBA promotes the concept that “beef is beef, whether or not the cattle have been born in Montana, Manitoba or Mazatlán” and, becoming a member of forces with commerce teams representing each nationwide and worldwide meat-packers, the NCBA additionally fought towards the USDA’s implementation of country-of-origin labeling (COOL), and has been tireless in its opposition towards demand for larger requirements within the therapy of animals.

Pitts’ article additionally factors out that NCBA’s CEO has clear conflicts of curiosity that coloration the group’s stance on issues like the usage of veterinary medication. Previous to turning into the CEO of NCBA, Roberts held advertising and gross sales positions with Upjohn Animal Well being (which merged with Pharmacia Animal Well being and later Pfizer Animal Well being) and Elanco Animal Well being’s beef enterprise unit.

“Gee, do you assume he may be a bit prejudiced relating to antibiotics, hormones and pure versus chemically produced beef?” Pitts writes.¹³

Nice Information: Grass Fed Dairy Customary Launched!

Luckily, you needn’t fear as there’s another certification that may bypass most of this nonsense. The American Grassfed Affiliation (AGA) launched much-needed grass fed requirements and certification for American-grown grass fed dairy,¹⁴ which is able to enable for larger transparency and conformity.

Previous to this certification, dairy might be bought as “grass fed” whether or not the cows ate solely grass, or acquired silage, hay and even grains throughout sure instances. As reported by Natural Authority:¹⁵

“The brand new rules are the product of a 12 months’s price of collaboration amongst dairy producers like Natural Valley in addition to certifiers like Pennsylvania Licensed Natural and a crew of scientists.

‘We got here up with a normal that is good for the animals, that satisfies what customers need and anticipate after they see grass ate up the label, and that’s economically possible for farmers,’ says AGA’s communications director Marilyn Noble of the brand new rules.

The usual might be launched formally in February on the American Grassfed Affiliation’s annual producer convention on the Stone Barns Heart for Meals and Agriculture in New York State, although the precise begin date for certification stays to be decided.”

Contemplating how vital a cow’s eating regimen is relating to the standard of its milk, particularly once we’re speaking about RAW milk, I’d strongly advise you to make sure your uncooked dairy is AGA licensed as grass fed (as soon as the certification turns into formally accessible).

USDA Grass Fed Beef Label Rescinded

Additionally make sure you search for the AGA’s grass fed label when shopping for grass fed meats, as in January 2016, the USDA’s Agricultural Advertising Service (AMS) rescinded its official requirements for the grass fed beef declare.¹⁶ In response to the AMS, a assessment of its authority discovered the company doesn’t have the authority to develop and keep advertising requirements, therefore it needed to remove its definition of “grass fed.”

The USDA’s Meals Security and Inspection Service (FSIS), which approves meat labels typically, nonetheless approves grass fed label claims. Nevertheless, producers of grass fed meats are free to outline their very own requirements. In response to the AGA, “FSIS is barely contemplating the feeding protocol of their label approvals — different points equivalent to confinement; use of antibiotics and hormones; and the supply of the animals, meat and dairy merchandise might be left as much as the producer.”

In different phrases, a producer of “grass fed beef” might theoretically confine the animals and feed them antibiotics and hormones and nonetheless put a grass fed label on the meat so long as the animals have been additionally fed grass. As famous by the AGA on the time:¹⁷

“The unlucky factor for producers who’ve labored exhausting to construct high quality grass fed applications is that, with no widespread requirements in place, they are going to be competing within the market with the commercial meatpackers who can co-opt the grass fed label.

As soon as once more, customers lose out on transparency and an understanding of what they’re shopping for. Grass fed has at all times been a supply of some confusion, however not, with no widespread requirements underpinning it, customers will discover it more and more tough to belief the grass fed label.

Like different principally meaningless label phrases like pure, cage-free and free-range, grass fed will grow to be simply one other feel-good advertising ploy utilized by the most important meatpackers to dupe customers into shopping for mass-produced, grain-fed feedlot meat.”

When Shopping for Grass Fed Meat, Search for the AGA Grass Fed Label

On the upside, the AGA grass fed requirements are extra complete and extra stringent than the AMS requirements have been. So, to make sure you’re really getting high-quality grass fed beef, make sure you search for the AGA grass fed label in your beef in addition to your dairy. No different grass fed certification gives the identical complete assurances because the AGA’s grass fed label, and no different grass fed program ensures compliance utilizing third-party audits.

Alternatively, get to know your native farmer and discover out first-hand how he raises his cattle. Many are very happy to offer you a tour and clarify the main points of their operation. Barring such face-to-face communication, the AGA grass fed brand is the one one in a position to assure that the meat comes from animals that:

• Have been fed a 100% forage eating regimen
• Have by no means been confined in a feedlot
• Have by no means acquired antibiotics or hormones
• Have been born and raised on American household farms (a overwhelming majority of the grass fed meats bought in grocery shops are imported, and with out COOL labeling, there is not any telling the place it got here from or what requirements have been adopted)

[ad_2]